American emergency departments get a “D” for patient care
A study by the American College of Emergency Physicians graded U.S. emergency departments a D+ due to increased demand, decreased supply, and poor patient care/access, highlighting systemic inefficiencies and concerns over patient safety amid rising Medicaid enrollment.
Many of us are familiar with the bad reputation attributed to our emergency departments (ED). Anyone who has spent time in an Emergency Department waiting room might understand where this negative reputation stems from, having experienced the ED's inefficiencies firsthand. In her article "Support for nation's emergency medical care gets D-plus," CNN's Elizabeth Landau likens the infamous hospital unit's success to that of a below-average student.
According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), from 1995 to 2010, the number of ED visits increased by 34%. What steps are hospitals taking to meet this growing demand? Not enough, according to a study conducted by the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP). Even with demand up since 2010, the supply of emergency departments went down by 11%. In the report’s conclusion, the United States was given a D+ overall.
The “D” in our grading system might as well stand for “dread,” as this is the feeling most of us associate with it. So how was the grade determined? Upon assessment of 136 emergency medical services, the ACEP, a national medical specialty society, issued the country a “report card.” While some states hovered in the average C-range, others failed the test, bringing the national average for the United States to a D+. Emergency Department care/access scored a dismal D-.
Dr. Jon Mark Hirshon, an emergency physician at the University of Maryland and ACEP board member, brings up a good point: "If I'm in a car crash and they bring me to a hospital that's not ready for me, my chances of survival are less. So you want a state that has that type of trauma system… that's one of the components of patient safety."
But, EDs won’t be let off the hook any time soon. The ACEP’s report also concludes that the millions recently added to Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act will also seek emergency care when unable to find physicians who accept their insurance.
With the healthcare technology and communications systems available today, a D+ should not be the grade associated with any healthcare facility, department, or service. Active-RFID systems can help improve the performance of the nation’s emergency departments by tackling issues related to patient care, staff rounding, high acuity workflow, and infection control.
As healthcare facilities and their executive teams are asked to do more with less, technologies like RTLS can help to locate inefficiencies in healthcare and automate certain processes, leaving staff—especially in the emergency department—with more time to dedicate to what is most important: patient care.
Read the story: Support for nation's emergency medical care gets D-plus
Related
7 Tips to Improve Patient Flow in Hospitals
The article discusses how hospitals can enhance patient flow—the efficient movement of patients from arrival to discharge—by leveraging IoT technologies and strategies such as real-time location systems integrated with electronic health records, which reduce wait times, improve care quality, decrease costs, and increase staff satisfaction, exemplified by Oregon Medical Group's successful implementation of CenTrak's patient flow software to optimize workflow despite challenging facility layouts.
The Secret To Gaining Staff Buy In For RTLS
The article explains that gaining staff buy-in for Real-Time Locating Systems (RTLS) in healthcare hinges on clear communication to dispel myths and demonstrate benefits such as enhanced staff protection through discreet emergency alerts, improved efficiency via accurate location tracking, and better documentation of response times, all of which contribute to safer, more efficient patient care environments.
RTLS From A Clinical Perspective
The article discusses how Real-Time Location Systems (RTLS) can alleviate the increased workload on clinical staff caused by nursing shortages by automating tasks such as locating medical equipment and logging activities, thereby improving efficiency, reducing non-value-added tasks, enhancing patient care time, and providing significant return on investment for healthcare systems, while emphasizing the importance of clinical staff buy-in for successful implementation.
Why Hospital Executives Need RTLS Strategy Initiatives
Caryn Hewitt, a seasoned healthcare executive with nearly 40 years of experience, emphasizes that hospital leaders should integrate Real-Time Location Systems (RTLS) into their strategy to gain real-time operational visibility, primarily through asset tracking and management, which leads to significant cost savings by optimizing equipment utilization and reducing unnecessary purchases or rentals.
What Is RTLS?
Real-Time Location Systems (RTLS) in healthcare use IoT technologies like infrared, RFID, Wi-Fi, and BLE to track and manage the real-time location of patients, staff, and equipment within medical facilities, improving workflow efficiency, safety, and quality of care by providing precise location data through badges or sensors communicating with location servers and software dashboards.
IoT Devices for Healthcare Facilities
CenTrak offers scalable and flexible IoT RTLS devices and wearables—including BLE, Multi-Mode, and clinical-grade options—for healthcare facilities to locate, monitor, and analyze patients, staff, and assets in real-time, enhancing workflow optimization, safety, cost reduction, and patient and staff experiences through interoperable technology such as UHF, Wi-Fi, Low Frequency, and Gen2IR with features like waterproofing, motion sensors, tamper detection, and configurable buttons.